top of page

Author: Di Cola et al.

Ref : Di Cola et al, Arthritis Res Ther. 2025 Mar 19;27(1):59.


La dose quotidienne nécessaire de colchicine chez les patients atteints de Fièvre Méditerranéenne Familiale pourrait être plus élevée chez les femmes

Summary


To date, no data exist on the relationship between daily colchicine dosage and body weight in patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). This question is frequently raised by patients or their parents during consultations. The objective of our study was to describe the daily colchicine dosage in a cohort of patients with FMF.


We conducted a retrospective analysis from 2016 to 2023 on adult FMF patients who were prospectively followed at the French National Reference Center for Auto-inflammatory Diseases at Tenon Hospital.


Among the 272 patients studied, 149 were women (57.8%), with a mean age of 43 years. The average weight was 67.8 kg, and the mean BMI was 24.2 kg/m². Colchicine was taken by 96% of the patients. A subgroup of 30 patients was receiving 2.5 mg/day of colchicine: the majority were women (n=23; 76.7%; p=0.018), with a significantly lower average weight (p=0.019); in fact, 26 out of 30 (87%) weighed less than 50 kg. Female sex was associated with a higher daily dose of colchicine (p=0.0208), whereas no significant correlation was found with weight (p=0.4073).


No signs of toxicity were observed in patients receiving 2.5 mg/day of colchicine, including those weighing under 50 kg, the majority of whom were women.


One hypothesis is that this increased need for colchicine in some women may be related to hormonal factors, with a possible hyperactivation of pyrin.


This is the first study to examine the relationship between weight and colchicine dosage in adults with FMF, highlighting a potential link with female sex.


This work provides reassurance to patients receiving 2.5 mg/day of colchicine: there is no toxicity at this dose in the absence of renal impairment.





First author: S. Georgin-Lavialle

Mise au oint en français sur les MAI

Abstract:


Autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are defined as disorders of innate immunity. They were initially defined in opposition to autoimmune diseases, due to the absence of involvement of the adaptive immune system and circulating autoantibodies. The 4 IADs first described are known as the “historic” IADs and include: familial Mediterranean fever (associated with mutations in the MEFV gene), cryopyrinopathies (associated with mutations in NLRP3), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (associated with mutations in TNFRSF1A) and mevalonate kinase deficiency (associated with mutations in MVK). Over the past 10 years, more than 50 new monogenic IBDs have been discovered thanks to advances in genetics. Diagnosis is facilitated by personal and family history-taking and detailed analysis of the signs and symptoms associated with febrile attacks, which must be associated with the presence of elevated blood biomarkers of inflammation. Increasingly powerful genetic analysis techniques can help refine the diagnosis. This chapter describes the main types of IJD, and helps to guide the clinician in the suspicion and diagnosis of IJD.






La protéine C-réactive est plus adaptée que l’amyloïde sérique A pour surveiller les crises et les périodes sans crise dans les maladies auto-inflammatoires systémiques

Abstract

Background: With their broad presentations and no global biomarker to discriminate crises and attack-free periods, Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases (SAID) are difficult to manage. This study assessed Serum Amyloid A (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum calprotectin as potential biomarkers to monitor patients with SAID.


Method: SAA (already studied in Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF)), CRP and serum calprotectin were measured on SAID adult patients from Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism (JIR) cohort during their follow-up visits between 2020 and 2022. Crises and attack-free periods were clinically determined.


Results: 96 measures, mainly from FMF (43 %) and Unclassified SAID (USAID) (37 %) patients were included. Using ROC curves, a threshold with sensitivity and specificity of/over 75 % was determined for SAA (9 mg/L) and CRP (9 mg/L) but not for serum calprotectin, not investigated further. With this threshold, the results were similar in FMF and USAID patients' subgroups. SAA and CRP showed a positive correlation with crises and attack-free periods in SAID patients (r = 0.4796, p < 0.001 and r = 0.5525, p < 0.001, respectively) as in FMF and USAID patients, with no significant difference between both markers in diagnosis value and ROC curves Area Under Curve (AUC) (p = 0.32). Only the CRP results were not influenced by obesity.


Conclusion: SAA and CRP can discriminate crisis and attack-free periods in our cohort of SAID patients mainly composed of FMF and USAID patients. However, only CRP can be used regardless of body mass index. It is the first report of common biomarkers for all SAID, including USAID patients, with CRP widely accessible in routine worldwide.




bottom of page